This figure undoubtedly was not suspended, neither represented so. However, it seems that the title of a work, or the collection or exhibition of which it is part, must surface somewhere in some work. I found the ‘Suspension’ (title of the collection) one of my choices for reading the artwork. One option is this: ‘It is a female figure lying under the light sunshine, casting a small shadow, bringing her legs towards her stomach ready to instinctively make a sudden movement for preventing the ball from hitting her. The convex sides of the illustrated frame might point to the fact that this all is being watched in a classic television set!’ But refusing such explanations allows us to see the ‘painting’ itself, without having made our mind beforehand. Then, we can go nearer and further back and forth to the surface of the work tracing the vivid lines of markers surpassing one another, or be fascinated by this sense of physical suspension that the light violet background, convex frame and even the circle produce. The circle resembles a principal point around which we turn; a turn of our mind/body back and forth movement. I believe the painter has enjoyed the process of arriving at this image from nothing, so why should we not–if we can–enjoy the outcome?